Domestic Violence, Witchcraft in the 21st Century

A new law in Arizona about domestic violence applying to dating couples or to someone who has sex, just once, seems like domestic violence laws are more about politics than violence, especially when a woman can say she is afraid of a man, though the man has done no violence to her nor has he threatened her. Domestic violence definitions are so ambiguous one can be prosecuted when no violence exists. This is the same logic as the witch hunts in Salem, MA in 1692. In Salem, a person did not have to perform any witchery. The person only had to be labeled a witch by teenage girls to send them to trial.

Those teenage girls in Salem in 1692 had needs. They needed to feel important, even if their actions to gain recognition caused the death of dozens. Or, maybe the teenagers in Salem just had a sadistic streak in them and enjoyed seeing people suffer. Maybe that same sadism lives in the lives of modern women who enjoy seeing men suffer by her lies and irrational fears. What power the words of a woman have.

Governments have always favored the most powerful political class. It's about power. Advocates for this always use the word "empower women" to make it sound like women have no power, when in fact they have more power than men. From the article, - "Gestalum said it's important to empower victims, especially women, to seek help on their own."

Women want aggressive men. They just want the men to be obediant, like a German Sheppard guard dog, who will defend and attack when ordered.

Women may not be as strong as men, but the mob, the State, with its enforcers and hit men, will do all the aggression and violence needed to satisfy the wrath of a woman.

Women practice more passive aggression than men. When a woman picks up the phone and calls 911 and accuses a man of abuse, she is practicing passive aggression. Chivalry is alive and well and it allows the passive aggressiveness of the little women to prevail over the overt aggression of the males.

Modern women also have a need for sympathy and recognition. Many modern women have a misandric attitude and they will do anything to sooth their wrath towards men.

I like women. I am not a misogynist. I think men and women will negotiate, compromise, succeed and fail in their relationships. These personal relationships should be between two private individuals. What I dislike and disapprove of is the State taking sides in these personal relationships. If this trend of the State aiding and abetting women, it will soon be law that in all personal relationships between men and women, the woman is in charge.

The Sword of Damocles hangs over any man who is in a relationship with an American woman.

Charles Tolleson, masculinist