Female campaign money contributors

"There never will be complete equality until women themselves help to make laws and elect lawmakers. I declare to you that woman must not depend upon the protection of man, but must be taught to protect herself and there I take my stand." Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906)

Susan B. Anthony would be proud that women no longer depend on men for protection. Women now depend on the State "men" with their guns. Women simply dial 911 and the State Men come with guns drawn.

Want to know where the presidential candidates get all their money? Here you go. http://www.newsmeat.com/ The site gives the names of individuals who contribute more than $200 to candidates for president.

I did a random sampling of the gender of the individual contributors. Female contributors as a percentage were; Ron Paul-17%, Mitt Romney-33%, Rudy Giuliani-33%, Barack Obama-40%, Hillary Clinton-56%!

Ron Paul's small government libertarians are individualists. They are geeks and Jeremiah Johnson type mountain men. Ron Paul does not have many female contributors.

Hillary Clinton has the female votes. She promises them they will be cared for by the government. No men needed.

No system of government that punishes producers and rewards non producers will survive, but still the promises are made. Women believe they can be cared for by the government father and protector without having to compromise and negotiate.

I knew men were an endangered species when in 1969 flight attendants got the right to keep their jobs, even if they got married:-), and when- "It is now possible for a flight attendant to impregnate a pilot. (Richard Ferris, UAL CEO)

To read about how the size of government has grown since female suffrage, click here; http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=160530 then scroll down to "Stanford Law School" and click on the "California USA" paper. You will get a long PDF file with explanations of why women vote for big government.

It seems obvious that women would prefer a caring government to provide for their needs. Women may be able to work and support themselves today, or get alimony and child support, but their instincts tell them that their power is in their beauty, and desire from males. It did not take them long to realize their alternative power is in the ballot box.

Females realize they may become pregnant and need to nurture offspring. This basic instinct to see the survival of offspring is more powerful than the desire for individual liberty.

We should be grateful that nature gave one of our parents a desire to see us survive. This basic desire to see her offspring survive handicaps the female in competition for survival. She sees in big government programs a way to partially eliminate this handicap.

Now if males could only find a way to eliminate their handicap, desire for a woman. Can you imagine a world where men did not have a desire for a woman?

Charles Tolleson