Jefferson and the Danger of centralized Power

Gary is in favor of Universal Health Coverage in the U. S. If he gets it here, I suspect he would be in favor of it all over the world. Unlike the Mafia, Socialist never sleep. The Mafia will plunder you once a week and then leave you alone and go play. The socialist is always awake, traumatized about the injustices he sees, scheming of another way to control your life.

It would not matter if the government taxed us at a 100% rate and provided us the basic necessities; food, shelter, and health care. The costs would keep going up, and the quality down, because the third party payer system doesn't require accountability, in any industry. Even then the government would spend more than the 100% it would take in. Centralized power has never worked, and it won't work, no matter how much we want it to work. It just keeps taking away our freedoms, our social power, and creating more power for the State. If the States, counties, and cities want to provide health care, food, shelter, clothing, education, roads, dog parks, people parks, libraries, fire protection, police protection, and on and on, then let them compete and demonstrate what is the best form of government. Some states and cities are legislating a minimum wage and other compulsions that take away individual freedoms.

Jefferson was in favor of small government units deciding what to do about these social issues but he was against centralizing this power at the federal level. He wrote about this in a letter to Joseph Cabell in 1816. Part of the letter is pasted below. http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/P/tj3/writings/brf/jefl241.htm

Bilbo Baggins
-----------------------------------------------------

No, my friend, the way to have good and safe government, is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many, distributing to every one exactly the functions he is competent to. Let the national government be entrusted with the defence of the nation, and its foreign and federal relations; the State governments with the civil rights, laws, police, and administration of what concerns the State generally; the counties with the local concerns of the counties, and each ward direct the interests within itself. It is by dividing and subdividing these republics from the great national one down through all its subordinations, until it ends in the administration of every man's farm by himself; by placing under every one what his own eye may superintend, that all will be done for the best. What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government which has ever existed under the sun? The generalizing and concentrating all cares and powers into one body, no matter whether of the autocrats of Russia or France, or of the aristocrats of a Venetian senate. And I do believe that if the Almighty has not decreed that man shall never be free, (and it is a blasphemy to believe it,) that the secret will be found to be in the making himself the depository of the powers respecting himself, so far as he is competent to them, and delegating only what is beyond his competence by a synthetical process, to higher and higher orders of functionaries, so as to trust fewer and fewer powers in proportion as the trustees become more and more oligarchical. The elementary republics of the wards, the county republics, the States republics, and the republic of the Union, would form a gradation of authorities, standing each on the basis of law, holding every one its delegated share of powers, and constituting truly a system of fundamental balances and checks for the government. Where every man is a sharer in the direction of his ward-republic, or of some of the higher ones, and feels that he is a participator in the government of affairs, not merely at an election one day in the year, but every day; when there shall not be a man in the State who will not be a member of some one of its councils, great or small, he will let the heart be torn out of his body sooner than his power be wrested from him by a Caesar or a Bonaparte. How powerfully did we feel the energy of this organization in the case of embargo? I felt the foundations of the government shaken under my feet by the New England townships. There was not an individual in their States whose body was not thrown with all its momentum into action; and although the whole of the other States were known to be in favor of the measure, yet the organization of this little selfish minority enabled it to overrule the Union. What would the unwieldy counties of the middle, the south, and the west do? Call a county meeting, and the drunken loungers at and about the court houses would have collected, the distances being too great for the good people and the industrious generally to attend. The character of those who really met would have been the measure of the weight they would have had in the scale of public opinion. As Cato, then, concluded every speech with the words, "Carthago delenda est," so do I every opinion, with the injunction, "divide the counties into wards." Begin them only for a single purpose; they will soon show for what others they are the best instruments.